Quality in Qualitative Research

  • Becker, PH. (1993) Common Pitfalls in Published Grounded Theory Research Qual Health Res 1993 3: 254.
  • Barbour R. (2001) Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ, 322: 1115-1117
  • Boulton, M., Fitzpatrick, R. & Swinburn, C. (1996) Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice2(3): 171-179. 
  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Chapter 10. In: Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. London: Sage.
  • Elliott, N. & Lazenbatt, A. (2005) How to recognize a ‘Quality’ grounded theory research study. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 22(3): 48-53.
  • Mays, N. & Pope, C. (1995) Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ, 311: 109-112.
  • Mays, N. & Pope, C. (2000) Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ,  320: 50-52.
  • Morse, J. (1999) Silent debates in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research 9: 163-165.
  • Spencer, L., Ritchie, A., Lewis, J. & Dillon, L. (2003) Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. London: Strategy Unit.
  • Tracy, SJ. (2010) Qualitative Quality: Eight ”Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry 16: 837.
  • Whittemore, R. Chase, S.K. & Mandle, C.L. (2001) Validity in Qualitative Research, QHR 11(4): 522-537.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: